 | SalesVantage.com >> Article Archives >> Brand Marketing >> Are You Wasting Money on Publicity?
|
Brand Marketing |
 |
 | | Are You Wasting Money on Publicity?
By Gordon G. Andrew, Managing Partner, Highlander Consulting
“There’s no such thing as bad publicity”
may work for Lindsay Lohan, but it has no application for companies that
care about their brand.
|
Every year, companies waste time and money generating publicity
that accomplishes little or nothing in terms of tangible business
outcomes.
Here are a few hard truths regarding publicity:
- Your audiences are unlikely to notice the
exposure, or do anything about it. Even with content
shelf-life driven by intelligent SEO management, there is simply too
much information, too many online and offline media sources, and too
little time in the day for your customers, prospects and referral
sources to read, see or hear your message. And if they do get your
message, there’s often little motivation for them to act on
it.
- Publicity volume does not translate into better
results. A single high-value media placement
that’s properly merchandised often has greater impact than a
pile of press clippings. In fact, publicity for its own sake is often
unfocused, with no connection to the company’s underlying
value proposition or core messages; generating confusion and apathy
among target audiences.
- Some types of publicity have significantly
greater marketing value than others. The old PR adage
that “There’s no such thing as bad
publicity” may work for Lindsay Lohan, but it has no
application for companies that care about their brand. To calculate the
media placement value of various types of publicity (see chart above),
Highlander Consulting uses three key criteria:
- BRAND RISK – If you
have little control over how your company’s reputation or
intellectual capital is presented – such as in a feature story
where a reporter or editor will seek to produce “balanced
coverage” by presenting negative items or including a
competitor – then the publicity has inherent brand risk.
(Value Scoring: +1 if you have total control over content; -1
if you have little or no control.)
- CREDIBILITY –
Often called “masthead value,” this factor is based
on how well the media source is recognized and respected. The potential
value of the publicity is based in large measure on the underlying
credibility of the source, because the exposure supplies an inherent
3rd party endorsement. (Value Scoring:
+1 if the source has strong credibility; -1 if it has low
credibility.)
- MERCHANDISING POTENTIAL
– This often overlooked factor is sometimes mistakenly called
“reprint value,” but Merchandising Potential
encompasses far more, relating to how easily and how broadly the media
exposure can be leveraged to support and drive specific marketing goals.
Simply posting publicity on a website does not deliver a high ROI.
(Value Scoring: +1 if the publicity has a range of
applications; -1 if it's limited to one or two.)
Using this ranking methodology, and as reflected in the chart
above , bylined articles and OpEd pieces published in credible sources
typically deliver the highest ROI; while inclusion (being mentioned or
quoted) in a round-up news or feature story does not score well. Most
home-grown efforts, such as self-published press releases, have
absolutely no value.
By using this formula, or a similar methodology, to evaluate
the potential ROI of individual publicity tactics, and by building media
and marketing strategies around only high-value activity,companies can
consistently make the connection between publicity and tangible business
results.
Gordon G. Andrew has more than 25 years of experience in public
relations and marketing communications, with industry depth in financial
and professional services, healthcare, technology and outsourcing. His
Marketing Craftsmanship® approach ensures a tangible connection
between marketing activity and sales results. Visit www.highlanderconsulting.com to learn more
More articles by Gordon G. Andrew
More articles on Brand Marketing
|  |